IFGL vs SCHD
iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. IFGL offers more diversification with 281 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IFGL | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.48% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $82M | $108.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.98% | 3.13% | |
| Holdings | 281 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +0.62% | +26.54% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.53% | +30.90% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.77% | +16.29% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -2.57% | +9.65% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.8% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -71.3% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 12, 2007 | Oct 20, 2011 |
IFGL vs SCHD Performance
iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF (IFGL) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year IFGL returned +2.53% while SCHD returned +30.90%. Year to date, IFGL is up 0.62% versus a gain of 26.54% for SCHD.
Over three years, IFGL compounded at +8.77% per year against +16.29% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are -2.57% and +9.65% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.51% annualized vs -2.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IFGL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.8% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -71.3% for IFGL and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IFGL charges 0.48% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $48 vs $6 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IFGL currently yields 3.98% against 3.13% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
IFGL and SCHD share 0 holdings out of 357 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IFGL or SCHD?
IFGL has an expense ratio of 0.48% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $42 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IFGL or SCHD?
Over the past year IFGL returned +2.53% vs +30.90% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), IFGL annualized -2.97% vs +11.51% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IFGL or SCHD?
IFGL has been the more volatile fund at 19.8% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: IFGL -71.3% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both IFGL and SCHD?
IFGL and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IFGL and SCHD?
IFGL and SCHD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 357 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IFGL or SCHD?
IFGL yields 3.98% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so IFGL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.