IFGL vs VXUS

IFGL vs VXUS

Which is better, IFGL or VXUS?

Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.

VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VXUSHigher Returns: VXUS

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIFGLVXUS
Expense Ratio0.48%0.05%Best
AUM$81M$158.1B
Dividend Yield3.98%2.59%
Holdings2808,747
YTD Return-1.14%+16.15%Best
1Y Return+1.86%+27.58%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+7.62%+20.48%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-2.76%+9.09%Best
Volatility (annualized)16.9%15.0%Best
Max Drawdown-50.5%-39.9%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$8,694$15,450Best
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleMid Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionNov 12, 2007Jan 26, 2011

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 28, 2011 to Sep 4, 2026 (15.6 years).

IFGL vs VXUS growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 15.6 years both funds cover.

IFGL vs VXUS Performance

iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF (IFGL) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IFGL returned +1.86% while VXUS returned +27.58%. Year to date, IFGL is down 1.14% versus a gain of 16.15% for VXUS.

Over three years, IFGL compounded at +7.62% per year against +20.48% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are -2.76% and +9.09% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.93% annualized vs -0.96%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IFGL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.9% compared with 15.0% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.5% for IFGL and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IFGL charges 0.48% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $48 vs $5 annually, a gap of $43 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IFGL currently yields 3.98% against 2.59% for VXUS.

Holdings Overlap

IFGL already in VXUS72.4%

At least 72.4% of IFGL's money is in holdings VXUS also owns.

Stated as a floor: for VXUS, our book for it covers 87.7% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.

Most of IFGL is already inside VXUS. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

170 positions in common, counted across the 257 positions we hold weights for in IFGL and 8,094 in VXUS, against full books of 280 and 8,747.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IFGLWeight in VXUSDifference
GMG:AUGoodman Group5.88%0.10%5.78%
8802:JPMitsubishi Estate Co. Ltd. Com Stk3.56%0.06%3.50%
8801:JPMitsui Fudosan Co. Ltd. Com Stk3.33%0.05%3.28%
SGRO:LNSegro Plc2.45%0.04%2.41%
URW:PAUnibail-rodamco Se & Wfund Unibail-rodamco Nv2.07%0.03%2.04%
SCG:AUScentre Group Reit2.03%0.03%2.00%
8830:JPSumitomo Realty & Development Co. Ltd. Com Stk1.99%0.03%1.96%
SPSN:SMSwiss Prime Site Ag1.79%0.03%1.76%
NXT:AUNextdc, Ltd.1.15%0.02%1.13%
PSPN:SMPsp Swiss Property Ag1.13%0.02%1.11%

72.4% of IFGL is already inside VXUS.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

IFGLVXUS

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IFGL or VXUS?

IFGL has an expense ratio of 0.48% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $43 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, IFGL or VXUS?

Over the past year IFGL returned +1.86% vs +27.58% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), IFGL annualized -0.96% vs +4.93% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, IFGL or VXUS?

IFGL has been the more volatile fund at 16.9% annualized versus 15.0% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: IFGL -50.5% vs VXUS -39.9%.

Should I hold both IFGL and VXUS?

IFGL and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between IFGL and VXUS?

At least 72.4% of IFGL's money is in holdings VXUS also owns. Our book for VXUS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 170 positions in common, counted across the 257 positions we hold weights for in IFGL and 8,094 in VXUS.

Which pays a higher dividend, IFGL or VXUS?

IFGL yields 3.98% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so IFGL currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VXUS better than IFGL?

VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.