IFN vs QQQ
Aberdeen India Fund Inc. vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IFN | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.35% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $703M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 20.53% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 50 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | -9.83% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | -13.16% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -0.69% | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.28% | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 31.5% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.5% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 23, 1994 | Mar 10, 1999 |
IFN vs QQQ Performance
Aberdeen India Fund Inc. (IFN) is a ETF from Aberdeen and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year IFN returned -13.16% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, IFN is down 9.83% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Over three years, IFN compounded at -0.69% per year against +25.96% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +0.28% and +14.54% respectively. Across the full 27-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.03% annualized vs +3.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IFN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.5% compared with 30.6% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.5% for IFN and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.33. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IFN charges 1.35% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $135 vs $18 annually, a gap of $117 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IFN currently yields 20.53% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
IFN and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 151 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IFN or QQQ?
IFN has an expense ratio of 1.35% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $117 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IFN or QQQ?
Over the past year IFN returned -13.16% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (27 years), IFN annualized +3.26% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IFN or QQQ?
IFN has been the more volatile fund at 31.5% annualized versus 30.6% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: IFN -83.5% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both IFN and QQQ?
IFN and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.33, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IFN and QQQ?
IFN and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 151 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IFN or QQQ?
IFN yields 20.53% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so IFN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.