IFN vs VTI

IFN vs VTI

Which is better, IFN or VTI?

Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIFNVTI
Expense Ratio1.35%0.03%Best
AUM$703M$666.9B
Dividend Yield20.33%1.03%
Holdings503,543
YTD Return-12.90%+11.65%Best
1Y Return-14.17%+17.34%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-3.43%+20.35%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-1.24%+11.72%Best
Volatility (annualized)29.0%15.3%Best
Max Drawdown-83.5%-56.6%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$9,395$17,404Best
Fund FamilyAberdeenVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
InceptionFeb 23, 1994May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 31, 2001 to Sep 10, 2026 (25.3 years).

IFN vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 25.3 years both funds cover.

IFN vs VTI Performance

Aberdeen India Fund Inc. (IFN) is an ETF from Aberdeen and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IFN returned -14.17% while VTI returned +17.34%. Year to date, IFN is down 12.90% versus a gain of 11.65% for VTI.

Over three years, IFN compounded at -3.43% per year against +20.35% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -1.24% and +11.72% respectively. Across the full 25-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.01% annualized vs +3.07%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IFN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.0% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.5% for IFN and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.57. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IFN charges 1.35% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $135 vs $3 annually, a gap of $132 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IFN currently yields 20.33% against 1.03% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 50 holdings in IFN and 2,787 in VTI, totalling 91.5% and 90.6% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in IFN and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 50 and 3,543.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of IFN and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

IFNVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IFN or VTI?

IFN has an expense ratio of 1.35% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $132 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, IFN or VTI?

Over the past year IFN returned -14.17% vs +17.34% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (25 years), IFN annualized +3.07% vs +8.01% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, IFN or VTI?

IFN has been the more volatile fund at 29.0% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: IFN -83.5% vs VTI -56.6%.

Should I hold both IFN and VTI?

IFN and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.57, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, IFN or VTI?

IFN yields 20.33% while VTI yields 1.03%, so IFN currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than IFN?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.