IGPT vs VTI
Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, IGPT or VTI?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. IGPT led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IGPT | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.56% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.2B | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.01% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 116 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +60.32%Best | +12.30% |
| 1Y Return | +78.16%Best | +16.08% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +43.56%Best | +21.01% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +16.52%Best | +12.36% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.7% | 15.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -50.1%Best | -56.6% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $21,478Best | $17,908 |
| Top 10 Weight | 59.1% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 23, 2005 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 23, 2005 to Sep 18, 2026 (21.2 years).
IGPT vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 21.2 years both funds cover.
IGPT vs VTI Performance
Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IGPT returned +78.16% while VTI returned +16.08%. Year to date, IGPT is up 60.32% versus a gain of 12.30% for VTI.
Over three years, IGPT compounded at +43.56% per year against +21.01% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +16.52% and +12.36% respectively. Across the full 21-year window we track, IGPT has the edge at +15.39% annualized vs +9.50%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IGPT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.7% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.1% for IGPT and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IGPT charges 0.56% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $56 vs $3 annually, a gap of $53 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IGPT currently yields 0.01% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
74.9% of IGPT's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 16.2% of VTI's money is in holdings IGPT also owns.
Most of IGPT is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
59 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in IGPT and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 116 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,097 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for IGPT (81.3% of the fund), and 4 for IGPT that do not appear in VTI (1.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IGPT | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 9.02% | 6.40% | 2.62% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 7.94% | 2.90% | 5.04% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 8.43% | 1.70% | 6.73% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 8.05% | 1.29% | 6.76% |
| INTCIntel Corporation | 3.60% | 0.50% | 3.10% |
| SNDKSandisk Corp/De | 3.71% | 0.25% | 3.46% |
| STXSeagate Technology Holdings Plc | 2.97% | 0.27% | 2.70% |
| MRVLMarvell Technology Group Ltd. | 2.96% | 0.23% | 2.73% |
| WDCWestern Digital Corp Company Guar 11/28 3 | 2.49% | 0.26% | 2.23% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 2.25% | 0.22% | 2.03% |
74.9% of IGPT is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IGPT or VTI?
IGPT has an expense ratio of 0.56% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $53 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IGPT or VTI?
Over the past year IGPT returned +78.16% vs +16.08% for VTI, so IGPT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (21 years), IGPT annualized +15.39% vs +9.50% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IGPT or VTI?
IGPT has been the more volatile fund at 21.7% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: IGPT -50.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both IGPT and VTI?
IGPT and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IGPT and VTI?
74.9% of IGPT's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 16.2% of VTI's is in holdings IGPT also owns. They hold 59 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in IGPT and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, IGPT or VTI?
IGPT yields 0.01% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than IGPT?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. IGPT led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.