IGPT vs IVV
Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IGPT delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IGPT | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.56% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.2B | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.01% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 114 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +56.14% | +14.50% | |
| 1Y Return | +85.15% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +42.19% | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.79% | +13.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.8% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -50.1% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 23, 2005 | May 15, 2000 |
IGPT vs IVV Performance
Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IGPT returned +85.15% while IVV returned +22.02%. Year to date, IGPT is up 56.14% versus a gain of 14.50% for IVV.
Over three years, IGPT compounded at +42.19% per year against +21.80% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +14.79% and +13.37% respectively. Across the full 21-year window we track, IGPT has the edge at +15.33% annualized vs +7.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IGPT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.8% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.1% for IGPT and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IGPT charges 0.56% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $56 vs $3 annually, a gap of $53 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IGPT currently yields 0.01% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
IGPT and IVV share 28 holdings out of 579 unique holdings combined, representing a 18.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IGPT or IVV?
IGPT has an expense ratio of 0.56% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $53 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IGPT or IVV?
Over the past year IGPT returned +85.15% vs +22.02% for IVV, so IGPT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (21 years), IGPT annualized +15.33% vs +7.07% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IGPT or IVV?
IGPT has been the more volatile fund at 21.8% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IGPT -50.1% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both IGPT and IVV?
IGPT and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IGPT and IVV?
IGPT and IVV share 28 common holdings with a 18.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 579 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IGPT or IVV?
IGPT yields 0.01% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.