IHAK vs VTI
iShares Cybersecurity and Tech ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. IHAK delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IHAK | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.47% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.1B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.07% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 49 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +34.02% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.53% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.99% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.98% | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.8% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 11, 2019 | May 24, 2001 |
IHAK vs VTI Performance
iShares Cybersecurity and Tech ETF (IHAK) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IHAK returned +25.53% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, IHAK is up 34.02% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, IHAK compounded at +18.99% per year against +21.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +7.98% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, IHAK has the edge at +13.85% annualized vs +8.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IHAK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.8% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.4% for IHAK and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IHAK charges 0.47% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $47 vs $3 annually, a gap of $44 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IHAK currently yields 0.07% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
IHAK and VTI share 17 holdings out of 2805 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IHAK or VTI?
IHAK has an expense ratio of 0.47% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $44 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IHAK or VTI?
Over the past year IHAK returned +25.53% vs +22.35% for VTI, so IHAK leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), IHAK annualized +13.85% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IHAK or VTI?
IHAK has been the more volatile fund at 20.8% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: IHAK -34.4% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both IHAK and VTI?
IHAK and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IHAK and VTI?
IHAK and VTI share 17 common holdings with a 0.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2805 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IHAK or VTI?
IHAK yields 0.07% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.