IHAK vs IVV
iShares Cybersecurity and Tech ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, IHAK or IVV?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IHAK led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IHAK | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.47% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.1B | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.07% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 49 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +30.89%Best | +11.57% |
| 1Y Return | +19.85%Best | +17.57% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.03% | +20.71%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.85% | +12.80%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.0% | 16.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -34.4% | -33.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $13,927 | $18,262Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.5% | 37.9%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 11, 2019 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 13, 2019 to Sep 10, 2026 (7.2 years).
IHAK vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7.2 years both funds cover.
IHAK vs IVV Performance
iShares Cybersecurity and Tech ETF (IHAK) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IHAK returned +19.85% while IVV returned +17.57%. Year to date, IHAK is up 30.89% versus a gain of 11.57% for IVV.
Over three years, IHAK compounded at +16.03% per year against +20.71% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +6.85% and +12.80% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +15.38% annualized vs +13.37%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IHAK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.0% compared with 16.4% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.4% for IHAK and -33.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IHAK charges 0.47% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $47 vs $3 annually, a gap of $44 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IHAK currently yields 0.07% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
16.3% of IHAK's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 1.1% of IVV's money is in holdings IHAK also owns.
IHAK and IVV share little of their money.
5 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in IHAK and 505 in IVV, against full books of 49 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 490 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for IHAK (98.2% of the fund), and 18 for IHAK that do not appear in IVV (60.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IHAK and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IHAK or IVV?
IHAK has an expense ratio of 0.47% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $44 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IHAK or IVV?
Over the past year IHAK returned +19.85% vs +17.57% for IVV, so IHAK leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), IHAK annualized +13.37% vs +15.38% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IHAK or IVV?
IHAK has been the more volatile fund at 21.0% annualized versus 16.4% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IHAK -34.4% vs IVV -33.9%.
Should I hold both IHAK and IVV?
IHAK and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IHAK and IVV?
16.3% of IHAK's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 1.1% of IVV's is in holdings IHAK also owns. They hold 5 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in IHAK and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, IHAK or IVV?
IHAK yields 0.07% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than IHAK?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IHAK led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.