IHF vs QQQ
iShares US Health Care Providers ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. IHF delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IHF | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.38% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $1.2B | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.95% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 64 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +18.47% | +18.31% | |
| 1Y Return | +33.49% | +25.37% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.04% | +25.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.59% | +15.20% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.5% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -58.8% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 1, 2006 | Mar 10, 1999 |
IHF vs QQQ Performance
iShares US Health Care Providers ETF (IHF) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year IHF returned +33.49% while QQQ returned +25.37%. Year to date, IHF is up 18.47% versus a gain of 18.31% for QQQ.
Over three years, IHF compounded at +4.04% per year against +25.79% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +2.59% and +15.20% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.10% annualized vs +9.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 19.5% for IHF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -58.8% for IHF and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.57. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IHF charges 0.38% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $18 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IHF currently yields 0.95% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
IHF and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 164 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IHF or QQQ?
IHF has an expense ratio of 0.38% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $20 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IHF or QQQ?
Over the past year IHF returned +33.49% vs +25.37% for QQQ, so IHF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), IHF annualized +9.33% vs +13.10% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IHF or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 19.5% for IHF. Worst drawdown: IHF -58.8% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both IHF and QQQ?
IHF and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.57, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IHF and QQQ?
IHF and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 164 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IHF or QQQ?
IHF yields 0.95% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so IHF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.