ILIT vs QQQ
iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. ILIT delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ILIT | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.47% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $15M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.35% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 43 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | -3.17% | +19.52% | |
| 1Y Return | +57.63% | +26.68% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -4.53% | +26.64% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 44.1% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -72.1% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 21, 2023 | Mar 10, 1999 |
ILIT vs QQQ Performance
iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF (ILIT) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year ILIT returned +57.63% while QQQ returned +26.68%. Year to date, ILIT is down 3.17% versus a gain of 19.52% for QQQ.
Over three years, ILIT compounded at -4.53% per year against +26.64% for QQQ. Across the full 3-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.14% annualized vs -8.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ILIT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 44.1% compared with 30.6% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -72.1% for ILIT and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.42. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ILIT charges 0.47% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $47 vs $18 annually, a gap of $29 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ILIT currently yields 2.35% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
ILIT and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 137 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ILIT or QQQ?
ILIT has an expense ratio of 0.47% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $29 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ILIT or QQQ?
Over the past year ILIT returned +57.63% vs +26.68% for QQQ, so ILIT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), ILIT annualized -8.61% vs +13.14% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ILIT or QQQ?
ILIT has been the more volatile fund at 44.1% annualized versus 30.6% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: ILIT -72.1% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both ILIT and QQQ?
ILIT and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.42, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ILIT and QQQ?
ILIT and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 137 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ILIT or QQQ?
ILIT yields 2.35% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so ILIT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.