IMTB vs IVV
iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, IMTB or IVV?
Short Term Mid Quality against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IMTB | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.06% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $273M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.57% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 3,444 | 508 |
| YTD Return | -1.75% | +12.01%Best |
| 1Y Return | -0.98% | +16.48%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.73% | +21.21%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.08% | +12.95%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.3%Best | 15.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.3%Best | -33.9% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $9,960 | $18,384Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Short Term Mid Quality | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 1, 2016 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 7, 2016 to Sep 14, 2026 (9.9 years).
IMTB vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IMTB vs IVV Performance
iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF (IMTB) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IMTB returned -0.98% while IVV returned +16.48%. Year to date, IMTB is down 1.75% versus a gain of 12.01% for IVV.
Over three years, IMTB compounded at +4.73% per year against +21.21% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are -0.08% and +12.95% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +14.67% annualized vs +0.46%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.5% compared with 5.3% for IMTB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.3% for IMTB and -33.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.47. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IMTB charges 0.06% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $3 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IMTB currently yields 4.57% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
At least 1.3% of IVV's money is in holdings IMTB also owns.
Stated as a floor: for IMTB, our book for it covers 75.0% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
IVV and IMTB share little of their money.
3 positions in common, counted across the 1,038 positions we hold weights for in IMTB and 490 in IVV, against full books of 3,444 and 508.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IMTB and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IMTB or IVV?
IMTB has an expense ratio of 0.06% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $3 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IMTB or IVV?
Over the past year IMTB returned -0.98% vs +16.48% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), IMTB annualized +0.46% vs +14.67% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IMTB or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.5% annualized versus 5.3% for IMTB. Worst drawdown: IMTB -18.3% vs IVV -33.9%.
Should I hold both IMTB and IVV?
IMTB and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.47, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IMTB and IVV?
At least 1.3% of IVV's money is in holdings IMTB also owns. Our book for IMTB is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 3 positions in common, counted across the 1,038 positions we hold weights for in IMTB and 490 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, IMTB or IVV?
IMTB yields 4.57% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IMTB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than IMTB?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.