INCO vs VOO
Columbia India Consumer ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | INCO | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $225M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 34 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -4.43% | +14.27% | |
| 1Y Return | -1.70% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.22% | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.84% | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.5% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -47.7% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Columbia Threadneedle Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 10, 2011 | Sep 7, 2010 |
INCO vs VOO Performance
Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO) is a ETF from Columbia Threadneedle Investments and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year INCO returned -1.70% while VOO returned +21.79%. Year to date, INCO is down 4.43% versus a gain of 14.27% for VOO.
Over three years, INCO compounded at +9.22% per year against +22.19% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +7.84% and +13.28% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.59% annualized vs +9.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
INCO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.5% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -47.7% for INCO and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.47. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
INCO charges 0.75% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, INCO currently yields 0.00% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
INCO and VOO share 0 holdings out of 535 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, INCO or VOO?
INCO has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.
Which performed better, INCO or VOO?
Over the past year INCO returned -1.70% vs +21.79% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), INCO annualized +9.58% vs +13.59% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, INCO or VOO?
INCO has been the more volatile fund at 21.5% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: INCO -47.7% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both INCO and VOO?
INCO and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.47, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between INCO and VOO?
INCO and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 535 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, INCO or VOO?
INCO yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.