IPAC vs VOO
iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. IPAC delivered stronger 1-year returns. IPAC offers more diversification with 1,385 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IPAC | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2.8B | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.82% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 1,385 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +15.80% | +12.95% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.10% | +20.69% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.64% | +22.09% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.95% | +13.40% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.8% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -35.1% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 10, 2014 | Sep 7, 2010 |
IPAC vs VOO Performance
iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IPAC returned +21.10% while VOO returned +20.69%. Year to date, IPAC is up 15.80% versus a gain of 12.95% for VOO.
Over three years, IPAC compounded at +19.64% per year against +22.09% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +8.95% and +13.40% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.50% annualized vs +5.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 13.8% for IPAC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.1% for IPAC and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IPAC charges 0.09% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $3 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IPAC currently yields 3.82% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
IPAC and VOO share 1 holdings out of 1870 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IPAC | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| PNR | 0.01% | 0.02% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IPAC or VOO?
IPAC has an expense ratio of 0.09% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $6 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IPAC or VOO?
Over the past year IPAC returned +21.10% vs +20.69% for VOO, so IPAC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), IPAC annualized +5.97% vs +13.50% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IPAC or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 13.8% for IPAC. Worst drawdown: IPAC -35.1% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both IPAC and VOO?
IPAC and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IPAC and VOO?
IPAC and VOO share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1870 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IPAC or VOO?
IPAC yields 3.82% while VOO yields 1.08%, so IPAC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.