IPOS vs VTI
Renaissance International IPO ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. IPOS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IPOS | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.80% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $12M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.36% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 38 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +37.08% | +14.82% | |
| 1Y Return | +48.10% | +22.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.79% | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -5.91% | +12.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.8% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -73.1% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Renaissance Capital | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 6, 2014 | May 24, 2001 |
IPOS vs VTI Performance
Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS) is a ETF from Renaissance Capital and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IPOS returned +48.10% while VTI returned +22.43%. Year to date, IPOS is up 37.08% versus a gain of 14.82% for VTI.
Over three years, IPOS compounded at +17.79% per year against +21.93% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -5.91% and +12.34% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.16% annualized vs +1.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IPOS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.8% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -73.1% for IPOS and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.56. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IPOS charges 0.80% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $80 vs $3 annually, a gap of $77 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IPOS currently yields 0.36% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
IPOS and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2837 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IPOS or VTI?
IPOS has an expense ratio of 0.80% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $77 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IPOS or VTI?
Over the past year IPOS returned +48.10% vs +22.43% for VTI, so IPOS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), IPOS annualized +1.60% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IPOS or VTI?
IPOS has been the more volatile fund at 21.8% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: IPOS -73.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both IPOS and VTI?
IPOS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.56, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IPOS and VTI?
IPOS and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2837 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IPOS or VTI?
IPOS yields 0.36% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.