IQGR vs IVV
Astoria International Quality Growth Kings ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, IQGR or IVV?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IQGR is less concentrated, with 21.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IQGR | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.58% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $16M | $896.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 131 | 508 |
| YTD Return | -2.79% | +12.15%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +14.42% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.09% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% |
| Top 10 Weight | 21.9%Best | 38.9% |
| Fund Family | Astoria Portfolio Advisors | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 15, 2026 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
IQGR vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IQGR vs IVV Performance
Astoria International Quality Growth Kings ETF (IQGR) is an ETF from Astoria Portfolio Advisors and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, IQGR is down 2.79% versus a gain of 12.15% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IQGR charges 0.58% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $58 vs $3 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IQGR currently yields 0.00% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 131 holdings in IQGR and 506 in IVV, totalling 99.8% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 131 positions we hold weights for in IQGR and 506 in IVV, against full books of 131 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 500 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for IQGR (99.4% of the fund), and 4 for IQGR that do not appear in IVV (6.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IQGR and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IQGR or IVV?
IQGR has an expense ratio of 0.58% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $55 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, IQGR or IVV?
IQGR yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than IQGR?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IQGR is less concentrated, with 21.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.