IVOO vs VTI
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. IVOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVOO | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.07% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $3.8B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.18% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 408 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +18.11% | +14.82% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.72% | +22.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.00% | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.18% | +12.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.0% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -42.5% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 7, 2010 | May 24, 2001 |
IVOO vs VTI Performance
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IVOO returned +24.72% while VTI returned +22.43%. Year to date, IVOO is up 18.11% versus a gain of 14.82% for VTI.
Over three years, IVOO compounded at +16.00% per year against +21.93% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +9.18% and +12.34% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, IVOO has the edge at +11.54% annualized vs +8.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.0% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.5% for IVOO and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVOO charges 0.07% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $7 vs $3 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVOO currently yields 1.18% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
IVOO and VTI share 302 holdings out of 2886 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVOO or VTI?
IVOO has an expense ratio of 0.07% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $4 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVOO or VTI?
Over the past year IVOO returned +24.72% vs +22.43% for VTI, so IVOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), IVOO annualized +11.54% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVOO or VTI?
IVOO has been the more volatile fund at 17.0% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: IVOO -42.5% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both IVOO and VTI?
IVOO and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IVOO and VTI?
IVOO and VTI share 302 common holdings with a 2.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2886 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVOO or VTI?
IVOO yields 1.18% while VTI yields 1.07%, so IVOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.