IVV vs IXC
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs iShares Global Energy ETF
Which is better, IVV or IXC?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 3Y and the full window, IXC over 1Y and 5Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | IXC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.37% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $2.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 2.87% |
| Holdings | 508 | 65 |
| YTD Return | +14.15% | +36.39%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.31% | +44.35%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.17%Best | +16.29% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.85% | +23.31%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.8%Best | 22.8% |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5%Best | -76.1% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $19,128 | $28,510Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8%Best | 57.9% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Nov 12, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 16, 2001 to Sep 21, 2026 (24.8 years).
IVV vs IXC growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 24.8 years both funds cover.
IVV vs IXC Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IVV returned +17.31% while IXC returned +44.35%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.15% versus a gain of 36.39% for IXC.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +23.17% per year against +16.29% for IXC; over five years the annualized figures are +13.85% and +23.31% respectively. Across the full 25-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +8.36% annualized vs +6.42%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IXC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.8% compared with 14.8% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -76.1% for IXC. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while IXC charges 0.37%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $37 annually, a gap of $34 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 2.87% for IXC.
Holdings Overlap
3.6% of IVV's money is in holdings IXC also owns. 59.6% of IXC's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
21 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 51 in IXC, against full books of 508 and 65.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 5 positions for IXC that do not appear in our book for IVV (9.7% of the fund), and 461 for IVV that do not appear in IXC (95.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in IXC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 1.01% | 17.61% | 16.60% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 0.58% | 10.19% | 9.61% |
| COPConocophillips Common Stock USD 0.01 | 0.24% | 4.26% | 4.02% |
| MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp | 0.16% | 2.88% | 2.72% |
| VLOValero Energy | 0.16% | 2.81% | 2.65% |
| PSXPhillips 66 | 0.15% | 2.61% | 2.46% |
| WMBWilliams Cos. Inc. | 0.14% | 2.42% | 2.28% |
| SLBSchlumberger Nv. | 0.14% | 2.37% | 2.23% |
| EOGEog Resources Inc | 0.12% | 2.04% | 1.92% |
| KMIKinder Morgan Inc./de | 0.10% | 1.67% | 1.57% |
59.6% of IXC is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or IXC?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while IXC charges 0.37%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $34 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or IXC?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.31% vs +44.35% for IXC, so IXC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (25 years), IVV annualized +8.36% vs +6.42% for IXC. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or IXC?
IXC has been the more volatile fund at 22.8% annualized versus 14.8% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs IXC -76.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and IXC?
IVV and IXC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and IXC?
59.6% of IXC's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 59.6% of IXC's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 21 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 51 in IXC.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or IXC?
IVV yields 1.06% while IXC yields 2.87%, so IXC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IXC better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 3Y and the full window, IXC over 1Y and 5Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.