IVV vs JRI
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Nuveen Real Asset Income and Growth Fund
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | JRI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 3.97% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | - | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 11.87% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 413 | |
| YTD Return | +14.29% | +0.49% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.79% | +7.13% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.19% | +17.09% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.28% | +5.69% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 20.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -64.3% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Nuveen | |
| Category | Equity | Allocation/Balanced | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Apr 25, 2012 |
IVV vs JRI Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Nuveen Real Asset Income and Growth Fund (JRI) is a ETF from Nuveen. Over the past year IVV returned +21.79% while JRI returned +7.13%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.29% versus a gain of 0.49% for JRI.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.19% per year against +17.09% for JRI; over five years the annualized figures are +13.28% and +5.69% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.06% annualized vs +1.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
JRI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.0% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -64.3% for JRI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while JRI charges 3.97%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $397 annually, a gap of $394 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 11.87% for JRI.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and JRI share 43 holdings out of 709 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or JRI?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while JRI charges 3.97%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $394 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or JRI?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.79% vs +7.13% for JRI, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), IVV annualized +7.06% vs +1.09% for JRI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or JRI?
JRI has been the more volatile fund at 20.0% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs JRI -64.3%.
Should I hold both IVV and JRI?
IVV and JRI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and JRI?
IVV and JRI share 43 common holdings with a 2.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 709 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or JRI?
IVV yields 1.10% while JRI yields 11.87%, so JRI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.