IVV vs KARS
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | KARS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.72% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $76M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.18% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 87 | |
| YTD Return | +14.50% | -0.58% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.02% | +19.15% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.80% | +1.53% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.37% | -6.79% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 28.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -64.8% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | KraneShares | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jan 18, 2018 |
IVV vs KARS Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS) is a ETF from KraneShares. Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% while KARS returned +19.15%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.50% versus a loss of 0.58% for KARS.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.80% per year against +1.53% for KARS; over five years the annualized figures are +13.37% and -6.79% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.07% annualized vs +4.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KARS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 28.6% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -64.8% for KARS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while KARS charges 0.72%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $72 annually, a gap of $69 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.18% for KARS.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or KARS?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while KARS charges 0.72%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $69 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or KARS?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% vs +19.15% for KARS, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), IVV annualized +7.07% vs +4.03% for KARS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or KARS?
KARS has been the more volatile fund at 28.6% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs KARS -64.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and KARS?
IVV and KARS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and KARS?
IVV and KARS share 2 common holdings with a 1.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 582 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or KARS?
IVV yields 1.09% while KARS yields 0.18%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.