IVV vs KEAT
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Keating Active ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. KEAT delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | KEAT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.85% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $122M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 2.51% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 30 | |
| YTD Return | +12.71% | +16.38% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.89% | +26.84% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.08% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.96% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 12.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -10.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Keating Investment Counselors | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Mar 27, 2024 |
IVV vs KEAT Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Keating Active ETF (KEAT) is a ETF from Keating Investment Counselors. Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% while KEAT returned +26.84%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.71% versus a gain of 16.38% for KEAT.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 12.3% for KEAT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -10.6% for KEAT. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.15. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while KEAT charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $85 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 2.51% for KEAT.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and KEAT share 6 holdings out of 528 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or KEAT?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while KEAT charges 0.85%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $82 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or KEAT?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% vs +26.84% for KEAT, so KEAT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +7.00% vs +17.47% for KEAT. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or KEAT?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 12.3% for KEAT. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs KEAT -10.6%.
Should I hold both IVV and KEAT?
IVV and KEAT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.15, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and KEAT?
IVV and KEAT share 6 common holdings with a 1.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 528 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or KEAT?
IVV yields 1.10% while KEAT yields 2.51%, so KEAT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.