KEAT vs VXUS
Keating Active ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KEAT | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $119M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.66% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 27 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +12.47% | +14.07% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.44% | +27.24% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.14% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -10.6% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Keating Investment Counselors | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 27, 2024 | Jan 26, 2011 |
KEAT vs VXUS Performance
Keating Active ETF (KEAT) is a ETF from Keating Investment Counselors and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KEAT returned +26.44% while VXUS returned +27.24%. Year to date, KEAT is up 12.47% versus a gain of 14.07% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 11.9% for KEAT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.6% for KEAT and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.49. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KEAT charges 0.85% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $5 annually, a gap of $80 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KEAT currently yields 2.66% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
KEAT and VXUS share 10 holdings out of 7880 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KEAT or VXUS?
KEAT has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $80 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KEAT or VXUS?
Over the past year KEAT returned +26.44% vs +27.24% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), KEAT annualized +16.03% vs +4.83% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KEAT or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 11.9% for KEAT. Worst drawdown: KEAT -10.6% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both KEAT and VXUS?
KEAT and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.49, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between KEAT and VXUS?
KEAT and VXUS share 10 common holdings with a 1.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7880 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, KEAT or VXUS?
KEAT yields 2.66% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so KEAT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.