IVV vs LNGX
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Global X US Natural Gas ETF
Which is better, IVV or LNGX?
LNGX has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. LNGX led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | LNGX |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.45% |
| AUM | $850.0B | $51M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.73% |
| Holdings | 1,018 | 74 |
| YTD Return | +12.12% | +22.40%Best |
| 1Y Return | +12.53% | +20.91%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.54% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.93% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.8%Best | 32.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -8.9%Best | -17.9% |
| $10,000 over 1 years | $11,137 | $12,999Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.8%Best | 53.4% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Global X by mirae Asset |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 28, 2025 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 29, 2025 to Nov 11, 2026 (1 years).
IVV vs LNGX growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1 years both funds cover.
IVV vs LNGX Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Global X US Natural Gas ETF (LNGX) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Over the past year IVV returned +12.53% while LNGX returned +20.91%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.12% versus a gain of 22.40% for LNGX.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LNGX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 32.4% compared with 12.8% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.9% for IVV and -17.9% for LNGX. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.35. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while LNGX charges 0.45%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $45 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.73% for LNGX.
Holdings Overlap
0.7% of IVV's money is in holdings LNGX also owns. 42.6% of LNGX's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
9 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 35 in LNGX, against full books of 1,018 and 74.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 25 positions for LNGX that do not appear in our book for IVV (52.5% of the fund), and 490 for IVV that do not appear in LNGX (98.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in LNGX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CHKChesapeake Energy Corp | 0.03% | 7.44% | 7.41% |
| EQTEqt Corp | 0.05% | 7.27% | 7.22% |
| EOGEog Resources Inc | 0.12% | 4.31% | 4.19% |
| DVNDevon Energy Corp. | 0.08% | 4.19% | 4.11% |
| OXYOccidental Petroleum Corp. | 0.07% | 4.14% | 4.07% |
| KMIKinder Morgan Inc./de | 0.10% | 3.90% | 3.80% |
| FANGDiamondback Energy Inc. | 0.06% | 3.91% | 3.85% |
| OKEOneok Inc. | 0.09% | 3.87% | 3.78% |
| WMBWilliams Cos. Inc. | 0.13% | 3.54% | 3.41% |
42.6% of LNGX is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or LNGX?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while LNGX charges 0.45%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or LNGX?
Over the past year IVV returned +12.53% vs +20.91% for LNGX, so LNGX leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +11.37% vs +29.99% for LNGX. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or LNGX?
LNGX has been the more volatile fund at 32.4% annualized versus 12.8% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -8.9% vs LNGX -17.9%.
Should I hold both IVV and LNGX?
IVV and LNGX have a monthly-return correlation of -0.35, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and LNGX?
42.6% of LNGX's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 42.6% of LNGX's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 9 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 35 in LNGX.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or LNGX?
IVV yields 1.09% while LNGX yields 0.73%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is LNGX better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. LNGX led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.