LNGX vs VYM
Global X US Natural Gas ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, LNGX or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. LNGX led over 1Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LNGX | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $51M | $95.8B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.73% | 2.23% |
| Holdings | 74 | 610 |
| YTD Return | +17.04%Best | +11.84% |
| 1Y Return | +21.59%Best | +16.77% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.83% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +10.75% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 34.1% | 12.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -17.9% | -6.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 1 years | $12,486Best | $11,491 |
| Top 10 Weight | 53.4% | 25.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Oct 28, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 29, 2025 to Nov 6, 2026 (1 years).
LNGX vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1 years both funds cover.
LNGX vs VYM Performance
Global X US Natural Gas ETF (LNGX) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LNGX returned +21.59% while VYM returned +16.77%. Year to date, LNGX is up 17.04% versus a gain of 11.84% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LNGX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 34.1% compared with 12.2% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.9% for LNGX and -6.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.53. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LNGX charges 0.45% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $4 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LNGX currently yields 0.73% against 2.23% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
76.1% of LNGX's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 2.3% of VYM's money is in holdings LNGX also owns.
Most of LNGX is already inside VYM. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, LNGX as of Oct 16, 2026 and VYM as of Aug 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
19 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in LNGX and 602 in VYM, against full books of 74 and 610.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 558 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for LNGX (96.3% of the fund), and 15 for LNGX that do not appear in VYM (19.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in LNGX | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| OVVOvintiv Inc. | 7.51% | 0.07% | 7.44% |
| CHKChesapeake Energy Corp | 7.44% | 0.09% | 7.35% |
| EQTEqt Corp | 7.27% | 0.13% | 7.14% |
| PRPermian Resources Corp | 4.64% | 0.07% | 4.57% |
| EOGEog Resources Inc | 4.31% | 0.31% | 4.00% |
| DVNDevon Energy Corp. | 4.19% | 0.22% | 3.97% |
| OXYOccidental Petroleum Corp. | 4.14% | 0.18% | 3.96% |
| KMIKinder Morgan Inc./de | 3.90% | 0.25% | 3.65% |
| OKEOneok Inc. | 3.87% | 0.24% | 3.63% |
| FANGDiamondback Energy Inc. | 3.91% | 0.15% | 3.76% |
76.1% of LNGX is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LNGX or VYM?
LNGX has an expense ratio of 0.45% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $41 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, LNGX or VYM?
Over the past year LNGX returned +21.59% vs +16.77% for VYM, so LNGX leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), LNGX annualized +24.86% vs +14.91% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, LNGX or VYM?
LNGX has been the more volatile fund at 34.1% annualized versus 12.2% for VYM. Worst drawdown: LNGX -17.9% vs VYM -6.7%.
Should I hold both LNGX and VYM?
LNGX and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.53, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between LNGX and VYM?
76.1% of LNGX's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 2.3% of VYM's is in holdings LNGX also owns. They hold 19 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in LNGX and 602 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, LNGX or VYM?
LNGX yields 0.73% while VYM yields 2.23%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than LNGX?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. LNGX led over 1Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.