IVV vs LOUP

IVV vs LOUP

Which is better, IVV or LOUP?

Large Cap Blend against Mid Cap Growth.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 5Y, LOUP over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.3%.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: splitLess Concentrated: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVLOUP
Expense Ratio0.03%Best0.70%
AUM$882.6B$216M
Dividend Yield1.06%0.00%
Holdings50896
YTD Return+13.60%+16.80%Best
1Y Return+16.32%+19.05%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+23.81%+38.16%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+14.03%Best+12.91%
Volatility (annualized)16.6%Best30.9%
Max Drawdown-33.9%Best-58.7%
$10,000 over 5 years$19,279Best$18,351
Top 10 Weight38.1%Best39.3%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Innovator ETFs Trust
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendMid Cap Growth
InceptionMay 15, 2000Jul 24, 2018

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 25, 2018 to Oct 2, 2026 (8.2 years).

IVV vs LOUP growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.2 years both funds cover.

IVV vs LOUP Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year IVV returned +16.32% while LOUP returned +19.05%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.60% versus a gain of 16.80% for LOUP.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +23.81% per year against +38.16% for LOUP; over five years the annualized figures are +14.03% and +12.91% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, LOUP has the edge at +16.94% annualized vs +14.01%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

LOUP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.9% compared with 16.6% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for IVV and -58.7% for LOUP. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while LOUP charges 0.70%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $70 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.00% for LOUP.

Holdings Overlap

IVV already in LOUP1.9%
LOUP already in IVV35.2%

1.9% of IVV's money is in holdings LOUP also owns. 35.2% of LOUP's money is in holdings IVV also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

11 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 30 in LOUP, against full books of 508 and 96.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 9 positions for LOUP that do not appear in our book for IVV (31.6% of the fund), and 486 for IVV that do not appear in LOUP (97.4%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in LOUPDifference
MRVLMarvell Technology Group Ltd.0.31%3.78%3.47%
LRCXLam Research Corp0.56%3.25%2.69%
NOWServicenow, Inc0.21%3.47%3.26%
VSTVistra Energy Corp.0.07%3.47%3.40%
RDDTReddit Inc-Cl A0.03%3.32%3.29%
SNPSSynopsys0.12%3.22%3.10%
ISRGIntuitive Surgical Inc.0.20%3.13%2.93%
VRTVertiv Co.0.15%3.18%3.03%
DDOGDatadog Inc0.11%2.83%2.72%
TTWOTake-Two Interactive Software, Inc.0.06%2.84%2.78%

35.2% of LOUP is already inside IVV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

IVVLOUP

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or LOUP?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while LOUP charges 0.70%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $67 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, IVV or LOUP?

Over the past year IVV returned +16.32% vs +19.05% for LOUP, so LOUP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), IVV annualized +14.01% vs +16.94% for LOUP. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, IVV or LOUP?

LOUP has been the more volatile fund at 30.9% annualized versus 16.6% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -33.9% vs LOUP -58.7%.

Should I hold both IVV and LOUP?

IVV and LOUP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and LOUP?

35.2% of LOUP's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 35.2% of LOUP's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 11 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 30 in LOUP.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or LOUP?

IVV yields 1.06% while LOUP yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is LOUP better than IVV?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 5Y, LOUP over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.