IVV vs LYLD
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Cambria LargeCap Shareholder Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. LYLD delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | LYLD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.59% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $7M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 2.15% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 52 | |
| YTD Return | +13.43% | +17.15% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.61% | +26.99% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.47% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.26% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 13.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -18.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Cambria Investment Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jul 12, 2024 |
IVV vs LYLD Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Cambria LargeCap Shareholder Yield ETF (LYLD) is a ETF from Cambria Investment Management. Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% while LYLD returned +26.99%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.43% versus a gain of 17.15% for LYLD.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 13.1% for LYLD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -18.6% for LYLD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.52. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while LYLD charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $59 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 2.15% for LYLD.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and LYLD share 40 holdings out of 516 unique holdings combined, representing a 4.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or LYLD?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while LYLD charges 0.59%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or LYLD?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% vs +26.99% for LYLD, so LYLD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +7.03% vs +15.46% for LYLD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or LYLD?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 13.1% for LYLD. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs LYLD -18.6%.
Should I hold both IVV and LYLD?
IVV and LYLD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.52, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and LYLD?
IVV and LYLD share 40 common holdings with a 4.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 516 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or LYLD?
IVV yields 1.09% while LYLD yields 2.15%, so LYLD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.