IVV vs MEDI
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Harbor Health Care ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. MEDI delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | MEDI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.80% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $42M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.04% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 41 | |
| YTD Return | +13.72% | +9.95% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.64% | +29.60% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.55% | +16.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.27% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 16.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -19.2% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Harbor Funds | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Nov 16, 2022 |
IVV vs MEDI Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Harbor Health Care ETF (MEDI) is a ETF from Harbor Funds. Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% while MEDI returned +29.60%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.72% versus a gain of 9.95% for MEDI.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.55% per year against +16.27% for MEDI. Across the full 4-year window we track, MEDI has the edge at +16.96% annualized vs +7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MEDI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.3% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -19.2% for MEDI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.54. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while MEDI charges 0.80%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $80 annually, a gap of $77 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.04% for MEDI.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and MEDI share 16 holdings out of 532 unique holdings combined, representing a 4.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or MEDI?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MEDI charges 0.80%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $77 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or MEDI?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% vs +29.60% for MEDI, so MEDI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +16.96% for MEDI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or MEDI?
MEDI has been the more volatile fund at 16.3% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs MEDI -19.2%.
Should I hold both IVV and MEDI?
IVV and MEDI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.54, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and MEDI?
IVV and MEDI share 16 common holdings with a 4.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 532 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MEDI?
IVV yields 1.09% while MEDI yields 0.04%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.