IVV vs MFVL
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Motley Fool Value Factor ETF
Which is better, IVV or MFVL?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | MFVL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.50% |
| AUM | $882.6B | $7M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 508 | 104 |
| YTD Return | +13.60%Best | +4.79% |
| 1Y Return | +16.32% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.81% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.03% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.1%Best | 46.9% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Motley Fool Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Dec 8, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
IVV vs MFVL growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs MFVL Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL) is an ETF from Motley Fool Asset Management. Year to date, IVV is up 13.60% versus a gain of 4.79% for MFVL.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while MFVL charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $50 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.00% for MFVL.
Holdings Overlap
4.7% of IVV's money is in holdings MFVL also owns. 83.0% of MFVL's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of MFVL is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
39 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 101 in MFVL, against full books of 508 and 104.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 505 and 101 positions we hold weights for.
IVV holds 458 positions MFVL does not, 94.6% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 8.00%, AAPL 7.39%, MSFT 5.57%, AMZN 3.80%, GOOGL 3.00%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in MFVL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CRMSalesforce Inc Crm Us Equity | 0.31% | 6.95% | 6.64% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 1.04% | 5.19% | 4.15% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 0.61% | 5.29% | 4.68% |
| BMYBristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 0.20% | 4.88% | 4.68% |
| DISWalt Disney Co | 0.28% | 4.41% | 4.13% |
| COFCapital One Financial Corp. | 0.20% | 4.43% | 4.23% |
| TMUST-Mobile Usa Inc Esrw Usd Npv Ref Sm#585558 | 0.13% | 4.22% | 4.09% |
| CVSCvs Health Corp. | 0.18% | 4.09% | 3.91% |
| ADBEAdobe Systems | 0.15% | 4.11% | 3.96% |
| HCAHca-the Healthcare Co | 0.10% | 3.32% | 3.22% |
83.0% of MFVL is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or MFVL?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MFVL charges 0.50%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and MFVL?
83.0% of MFVL's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 83.0% of MFVL's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 39 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 101 in MFVL.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MFVL?
IVV yields 1.06% while MFVL yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MFVL better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.