IVV vs MINT
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund
Which is better, IVV or MINT?
Large Cap Blend against Short Term Bond.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | MINT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.36% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $17.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 4.18% |
| Holdings | 508 | 1,018 |
| YTD Return | +11.03%Best | +2.96% |
| 1Y Return | +15.62%Best | +4.36% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.81%Best | +5.14% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.61%Best | +3.70% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.4% | 1.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9% | -4.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,109Best | $11,992 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | PIMCO (US) |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Short Term Bond |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Nov 16, 2009 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 17, 2009 to Sep 16, 2026 (16.8 years).
IVV vs MINT growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs MINT Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund (MINT) is an ETF from PIMCO (US). Over the past year IVV returned +15.62% while MINT returned +4.36%. Year to date, IVV is up 11.03% versus a gain of 2.96% for MINT.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +20.81% per year against +5.14% for MINT; over five years the annualized figures are +12.61% and +3.70% respectively. Across the full 17-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +12.56% annualized vs +1.22%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.4% compared with 1.2% for MINT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for IVV and -4.8% for MINT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.40. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while MINT charges 0.36%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $36 annually, a gap of $33 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 4.18% for MINT.
Holdings Overlap
At least 0.1% of IVV's money is in holdings MINT also owns.
Stated as a floor: for MINT, our book for it covers 63.1% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 695 in MINT, against full books of 508 and 1,018.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in MINT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| KDPKeurig Dr Pepper Inc (kdp Us) | 0.07% | 0.39% | 0.32% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and MINT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or MINT?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MINT charges 0.36%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $33 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or MINT?
Over the past year IVV returned +15.62% vs +4.36% for MINT, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), IVV annualized +12.56% vs +1.22% for MINT. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or MINT?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 14.4% annualized versus 1.2% for MINT. Worst drawdown: IVV -33.9% vs MINT -4.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and MINT?
IVV and MINT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.40, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MINT?
IVV yields 1.06% while MINT yields 4.18%, so MINT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MINT better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.