IVV vs MIVL
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs MFS Active International Value ETF
Which is better, IVV or MIVL?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
IVV has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | MIVL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.57% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $25M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 508 | 66 |
| YTD Return | +12.51%Best | +4.04% |
| 1Y Return | +17.57% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.27% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.95% | - |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | MFS Investment Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 4, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
IVV vs MIVL growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs MIVL Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and MFS Active International Value ETF (MIVL) is an ETF from MFS Investment Management. Year to date, IVV is up 12.51% versus a gain of 4.04% for MIVL.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while MIVL charges 0.57%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $57 annually, a gap of $54 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.00% for MIVL.
Holdings Overlap
At least 0.1% of IVV's money is in holdings MIVL also owns.
Stated as a floor: for MIVL, our book for it covers 92.9% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
2 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 59 in MIVL, against full books of 508 and 66.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and MIVL you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or MIVL?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MIVL charges 0.57%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $54 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MIVL?
IVV yields 1.06% while MIVL yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MIVL better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.