IVV vs MSFW
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | MSFW | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.99% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $28M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 49.81% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 5 | |
| YTD Return | +14.50% | -7.67% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.02% | -18.86% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.80% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.37% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 42.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -45.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Roundhill Investments | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jul 24, 2025 |
IVV vs MSFW Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay ETF (MSFW) is a ETF from Roundhill Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% while MSFW returned -18.86%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.50% versus a loss of 7.67% for MSFW.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MSFW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 42.0% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -45.6% for MSFW. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.47. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while MSFW charges 0.99%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $99 annually, a gap of $96 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 49.81% for MSFW.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and MSFW share 1 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 4.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in MSFW | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFT | 4.57% | 32.67% | 28.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or MSFW?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MSFW charges 0.99%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $96 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or MSFW?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% vs -18.86% for MSFW, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +7.07% vs -16.39% for MSFW. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or MSFW?
MSFW has been the more volatile fund at 42.0% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs MSFW -45.6%.
Should I hold both IVV and MSFW?
IVV and MSFW have a monthly-return correlation of 0.47, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and MSFW?
IVV and MSFW share 1 common holdings with a 4.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MSFW?
IVV yields 1.09% while MSFW yields 49.81%, so MSFW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.