MSFW vs VXUS
Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MSFW | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.99% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $28M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 49.81% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | -5.89% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | -17.21% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 42.4% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -45.6% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Roundhill Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 24, 2025 | Jan 26, 2011 |
MSFW vs VXUS Performance
Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay ETF (MSFW) is a ETF from Roundhill Investments and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MSFW returned -17.21% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, MSFW is down 5.89% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MSFW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 42.4% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -45.6% for MSFW and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.08. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MSFW charges 0.99% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $5 annually, a gap of $94 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MSFW currently yields 49.81% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
MSFW and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7863 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MSFW or VXUS?
MSFW has an expense ratio of 0.99% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $94 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MSFW or VXUS?
Over the past year MSFW returned -17.21% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), MSFW annualized -15.08% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MSFW or VXUS?
MSFW has been the more volatile fund at 42.4% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: MSFW -45.6% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both MSFW and VXUS?
MSFW and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.08, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MSFW and VXUS?
MSFW and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7863 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MSFW or VXUS?
MSFW yields 49.81% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so MSFW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.