MSFW vs VYM
Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MSFW | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.99% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $28M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 49.81% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | -6.01% | +16.16% | |
| 1Y Return | -17.50% | +26.05% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 42.4% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -45.6% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Roundhill Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 24, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
MSFW vs VYM Performance
Roundhill MSFT WeeklyPay ETF (MSFW) is a ETF from Roundhill Investments and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MSFW returned -17.50% while VYM returned +26.05%. Year to date, MSFW is down 6.01% versus a gain of 16.16% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MSFW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 42.4% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -45.6% for MSFW and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.20. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MSFW charges 0.99% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $4 annually, a gap of $95 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MSFW currently yields 49.81% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
MSFW and VYM share 0 holdings out of 560 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MSFW or VYM?
MSFW has an expense ratio of 0.99% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $95 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MSFW or VYM?
Over the past year MSFW returned -17.50% vs +26.05% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), MSFW annualized -15.03% vs +7.09% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MSFW or VYM?
MSFW has been the more volatile fund at 42.4% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: MSFW -45.6% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both MSFW and VYM?
MSFW and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.20, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MSFW and VYM?
MSFW and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 560 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MSFW or VYM?
MSFW yields 49.81% while VYM yields 2.86%, so MSFW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.