IVV vs MSTZ
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs T-Rex 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF
Which is better, IVV or MSTZ?
Large Cap Blend against Leverage Strategy.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | MSTZ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 1.05% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $82M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 508 | 9 |
| YTD Return | +12.39%Best | -82.36% |
| 1Y Return | +16.61%Best | -39.07% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.38% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.51% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.7%Best | 188.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8% | - |
| $10,000 over 2 years | $13,943Best | $57 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | REX Shares |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Leverage Strategy |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 18, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 18, 2024 to Sep 18, 2026 (2 years).
IVV vs MSTZ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2 years both funds cover.
IVV vs MSTZ Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and T-Rex 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) is an ETF from REX Shares. Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% while MSTZ returned -39.07%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.39% versus a loss of 82.36% for MSTZ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MSTZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 188.9% compared with 12.7% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.23. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while MSTZ charges 1.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $105 annually, a gap of $102 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.00% for MSTZ.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and MSTZ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or MSTZ?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MSTZ charges 1.05%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $102 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or MSTZ?
Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% vs -39.07% for MSTZ, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +18.08% vs -92.43% for MSTZ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or MSTZ?
MSTZ has been the more volatile fund at 188.9% annualized versus 12.7% for IVV.
Should I hold both IVV and MSTZ?
IVV and MSTZ have a monthly-return correlation of -0.23, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MSTZ?
IVV yields 1.06% while MSTZ yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MSTZ better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.