IVV vs MSTZ
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs T-Rex 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. MSTZ delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | MSTZ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 1.05% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $96M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 9 | |
| YTD Return | +12.71% | -59.34% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.89% | +25.78% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.08% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.96% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 189.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -99.4% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | REX Shares | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 18, 2024 |
IVV vs MSTZ Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and T-Rex 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) is a ETF from REX Shares. Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% while MSTZ returned +25.78%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.71% versus a loss of 59.34% for MSTZ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MSTZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 189.0% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -99.4% for MSTZ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.25. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while MSTZ charges 1.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $105 annually, a gap of $102 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.00% for MSTZ.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and MSTZ share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or MSTZ?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MSTZ charges 1.05%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $102 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or MSTZ?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% vs +25.78% for MSTZ, so MSTZ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +7.00% vs -89.45% for MSTZ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or MSTZ?
MSTZ has been the more volatile fund at 189.0% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs MSTZ -99.4%.
Should I hold both IVV and MSTZ?
IVV and MSTZ have a monthly-return correlation of -0.25, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and MSTZ?
IVV and MSTZ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MSTZ?
IVV yields 1.10% while MSTZ yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.