MSTZ vs VYM
T-Rex 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. MSTZ delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MSTZ | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.05% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $96M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 9 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | -53.63% | +14.66% | |
| 1Y Return | +48.74% | +22.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.72% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.18% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 188.1% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -99.4% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | REX Shares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 18, 2024 | Nov 10, 2006 |
MSTZ vs VYM Performance
T-Rex 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) is a ETF from REX Shares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MSTZ returned +48.74% while VYM returned +22.16%. Year to date, MSTZ is down 53.63% versus a gain of 14.66% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MSTZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 188.1% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -99.4% for MSTZ and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.11. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MSTZ charges 1.05% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $105 vs $4 annually, a gap of $101 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MSTZ currently yields 0.00% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
MSTZ and VYM share 0 holdings out of 604 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MSTZ or VYM?
MSTZ has an expense ratio of 1.05% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $101 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MSTZ or VYM?
Over the past year MSTZ returned +48.74% vs +22.16% for VYM, so MSTZ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MSTZ annualized -88.74% vs +7.01% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MSTZ or VYM?
MSTZ has been the more volatile fund at 188.1% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: MSTZ -99.4% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both MSTZ and VYM?
MSTZ and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of -0.11, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MSTZ and VYM?
MSTZ and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 604 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MSTZ or VYM?
MSTZ yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.