MSTZ vs VXUS
T-Rex 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. MSTZ delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MSTZ | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.05% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $78M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 9 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | -32.21% | +14.07% | |
| 1Y Return | +187.77% | +27.24% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.14% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 186.2% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -99.4% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | REX Shares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 18, 2024 | Jan 26, 2011 |
MSTZ vs VXUS Performance
T-Rex 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) is a ETF from REX Shares and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MSTZ returned +187.77% while VXUS returned +27.24%. Year to date, MSTZ is down 32.21% versus a gain of 14.07% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MSTZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 186.2% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -99.4% for MSTZ and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.09. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MSTZ charges 1.05% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $105 vs $5 annually, a gap of $100 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MSTZ currently yields 0.00% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
MSTZ and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7862 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MSTZ or VXUS?
MSTZ has an expense ratio of 1.05% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $100 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MSTZ or VXUS?
Over the past year MSTZ returned +187.77% vs +27.24% for VXUS, so MSTZ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MSTZ annualized -86.66% vs +4.83% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MSTZ or VXUS?
MSTZ has been the more volatile fund at 186.2% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: MSTZ -99.4% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both MSTZ and VXUS?
MSTZ and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of -0.09, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MSTZ and VXUS?
MSTZ and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7862 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MSTZ or VXUS?
MSTZ yields 0.00% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.