IVV vs NAIL
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Direxion Daily Homebuilders & Supplies Bull 3X ETF
Which is better, IVV or NAIL?
Large Cap Blend against Multi Alternative.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 72.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | NAIL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.96% |
| AUM | $882.6B | $545M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.85% |
| Holdings | 508 | 102 |
| YTD Return | +13.60%Best | -45.59% |
| 1Y Return | +16.32%Best | -62.88% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.81%Best | -16.32% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.03%Best | -15.30% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1%Best | 86.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9%Best | -93.8% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $19,279Best | $4,359 |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.1%Best | 72.9% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Direxion Shares ETF Trust |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Aug 19, 2015 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 19, 2015 to Oct 2, 2026 (11.1 years).
IVV vs NAIL growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 11.1 years both funds cover.
IVV vs NAIL Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Direxion Daily Homebuilders & Supplies Bull 3X ETF (NAIL) is an ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust. Over the past year IVV returned +16.32% while NAIL returned -62.88%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.60% versus a loss of 45.59% for NAIL.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +23.81% per year against -16.32% for NAIL; over five years the annualized figures are +14.03% and -15.30% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +13.26% annualized vs -2.94%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NAIL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 86.6% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for IVV and -93.8% for NAIL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while NAIL charges 0.96%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $96 annually, a gap of $93 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.85% for NAIL.
Holdings Overlap
0.9% of IVV's money is in holdings NAIL also owns. 44.9% of NAIL's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
10 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 45 in NAIL, against full books of 508 and 102.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 35 positions for NAIL that do not appear in our book for IVV (56.7% of the fund), and 487 for IVV that do not appear in NAIL (98.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in NAIL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| DHIDr Horton Inc. | 0.06% | 11.61% | 11.55% |
| PHMPultegroup Inc. | 0.03% | 7.15% | 7.12% |
| LENLennar Corp. Class A | 0.03% | 5.44% | 5.41% |
| NVRNvr Inc. | 0.02% | 5.36% | 5.34% |
| HDHome Depot Inc/The | 0.47% | 3.37% | 2.90% |
| SHWSherwin Williams Co/the | 0.11% | 3.69% | 3.58% |
| LOWLowes Cos., Inc. | 0.17% | 3.17% | 3.00% |
| MASMasco Corp. | 0.02% | 2.22% | 2.20% |
| LIILennox International Inc | 0.02% | 1.84% | 1.82% |
| BLDRBuilders Firstsource Inc | 0.01% | 1.03% | 1.02% |
44.9% of NAIL is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or NAIL?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while NAIL charges 0.96%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $93 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or NAIL?
Over the past year IVV returned +16.32% vs -62.88% for NAIL, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), IVV annualized +13.26% vs -2.94% for NAIL. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or NAIL?
NAIL has been the more volatile fund at 86.6% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -33.9% vs NAIL -93.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and NAIL?
IVV and NAIL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and NAIL?
44.9% of NAIL's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 44.9% of NAIL's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 10 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 45 in NAIL.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or NAIL?
IVV yields 1.06% while NAIL yields 0.85%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NAIL better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 72.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.