IVV vs NAIL
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Direxion Daily Homebuilders & Supplies Bull 3X ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | NAIL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.96% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $585M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.83% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 54 | |
| YTD Return | +13.22% | -17.89% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.62% | -49.64% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.17% | -13.53% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.42% | -11.86% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 86.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -93.8% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Aug 19, 2015 |
IVV vs NAIL Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Direxion Daily Homebuilders & Supplies Bull 3X ETF (NAIL) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust. Over the past year IVV returned +21.62% while NAIL returned -49.64%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.22% versus a loss of 17.89% for NAIL.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.17% per year against -13.53% for NAIL; over five years the annualized figures are +13.42% and -11.86% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.02% annualized vs +0.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NAIL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 86.9% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -93.8% for NAIL. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while NAIL charges 0.96%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $96 annually, a gap of $93 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.83% for NAIL.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and NAIL share 10 holdings out of 544 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or NAIL?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while NAIL charges 0.96%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $93 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or NAIL?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.62% vs -49.64% for NAIL, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), IVV annualized +7.02% vs +0.73% for NAIL. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or NAIL?
NAIL has been the more volatile fund at 86.9% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs NAIL -93.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and NAIL?
IVV and NAIL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and NAIL?
IVV and NAIL share 10 common holdings with a 1.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 544 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or NAIL?
IVV yields 1.10% while NAIL yields 0.83%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.