IVV vs NBDS
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF
Which is better, IVV or NBDS?
Each has led over a different period.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window, NBDS over 3Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | NBDS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.40% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $181M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.35% |
| Holdings | 508 | 32 |
| YTD Return | +14.15% | +16.01%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.31%Best | +13.11% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.17% | +24.45%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.85% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1%Best | 23.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -19.9%Best | -29.8% |
| $10,000 over 4.5 years | $18,464Best | $17,208 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8%Best | 45.9% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Neuberger Berman |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Apr 6, 2022 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 7, 2022 to Sep 21, 2026 (4.5 years).
IVV vs NBDS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.5 years both funds cover.
IVV vs NBDS Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF (NBDS) is an ETF from Neuberger Berman. Over the past year IVV returned +17.31% while NBDS returned +13.11%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.15% versus a gain of 16.01% for NBDS.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +23.17% per year against +24.45% for NBDS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NBDS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.6% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.9% for IVV and -29.8% for NBDS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while NBDS charges 0.40%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $40 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.35% for NBDS.
Holdings Overlap
18.8% of IVV's money is in holdings NBDS also owns. 49.6% of NBDS's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
16 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 32 in NBDS, against full books of 508 and 32.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 12 positions for NBDS that do not appear in our book for IVV (33.9% of the fund), and 466 for IVV that do not appear in NBDS (79.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in NBDS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.07% | 7.65% | 0.42% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.84% | 2.67% | 1.17% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.16% | 4.78% | 3.62% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.65% | 2.85% | 0.20% |
| CEGConstellation Energy Corporation Com | 0.13% | 4.11% | 3.98% |
| HOODRobinhood Markets Inc - A | 0.13% | 3.71% | 3.58% |
| MPWRMonolithic Power Systems Inc | 0.09% | 3.52% | 3.43% |
| NOWServicenow, Inc | 0.23% | 3.05% | 2.82% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.56% | 1.53% | 0.03% |
| ISRGIntuitive Surgical Inc. | 0.20% | 2.63% | 2.43% |
49.6% of NBDS is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or NBDS?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while NBDS charges 0.40%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $37 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or NBDS?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.31% vs +13.11% for NBDS, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or NBDS?
NBDS has been the more volatile fund at 23.6% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -19.9% vs NBDS -29.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and NBDS?
IVV and NBDS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and NBDS?
49.6% of NBDS's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 49.6% of NBDS's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 16 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 32 in NBDS.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or NBDS?
IVV yields 1.06% while NBDS yields 0.35%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NBDS better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window, NBDS over 3Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.