IVV vs NBDS
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | NBDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.40% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $143M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.32% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 33 | |
| YTD Return | +13.43% | +16.37% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.61% | +20.71% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.47% | +21.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.26% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 23.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -29.8% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Neuberger Berman | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Apr 6, 2022 |
IVV vs NBDS Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF (NBDS) is a ETF from Neuberger Berman. Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% while NBDS returned +20.71%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.43% versus a gain of 16.37% for NBDS.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.47% per year against +21.96% for NBDS. Across the full 4-year window we track, NBDS has the edge at +13.26% annualized vs +7.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NBDS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.9% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -29.8% for NBDS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while NBDS charges 0.40%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $40 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.32% for NBDS.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and NBDS share 15 holdings out of 521 unique holdings combined, representing a 16.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or NBDS?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while NBDS charges 0.40%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $37 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or NBDS?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% vs +20.71% for NBDS, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVV annualized +7.03% vs +13.26% for NBDS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or NBDS?
NBDS has been the more volatile fund at 23.9% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs NBDS -29.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and NBDS?
IVV and NBDS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and NBDS?
IVV and NBDS share 15 common holdings with a 16.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 521 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or NBDS?
IVV yields 1.09% while NBDS yields 0.32%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.