IVV vs NSCI
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Nuveen Securitized Income ETF
Which is better, IVV or NSCI?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | NSCI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.38% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $240M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 3.84% |
| Holdings | 508 | 220 |
| YTD Return | +12.51%Best | +2.61% |
| 1Y Return | +17.57%Best | +4.29% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.27% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.95% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.3% | 1.9%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Nuveen |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | - |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 23, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
IVV vs NSCI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs NSCI Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Nuveen Securitized Income ETF (NSCI) is an ETF from Nuveen. Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% while NSCI returned +4.29%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.51% versus a gain of 2.61% for NSCI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.3% compared with 1.9% for NSCI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.45. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while NSCI charges 0.38%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $38 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 3.84% for NSCI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 505 holdings in IVV and 30 in NSCI, totalling 100.0% and 17.2% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 30 in NSCI, against full books of 508 and 220.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and NSCI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or NSCI?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while NSCI charges 0.38%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $35 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or NSCI?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% vs +4.29% for NSCI, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or NSCI?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 13.3% annualized versus 1.9% for NSCI.
Should I hold both IVV and NSCI?
IVV and NSCI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.45, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or NSCI?
IVV yields 1.06% while NSCI yields 3.84%, so NSCI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NSCI better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.