IVV vs NXG
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. NXG delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | NXG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 3.15% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $482M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 11.68% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 65 | |
| YTD Return | +12.71% | +18.73% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.89% | +37.30% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.08% | +35.59% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.96% | +17.57% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 29.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -86.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | The Cushing Funds | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 26, 2012 |
IVV vs NXG Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund (NXG) is a ETF from The Cushing Funds. Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% while NXG returned +37.30%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.71% versus a gain of 18.73% for NXG.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.08% per year against +35.59% for NXG; over five years the annualized figures are +12.96% and +17.57% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.00% annualized vs +0.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NXG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.3% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -86.5% for NXG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while NXG charges 3.15%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $315 annually, a gap of $312 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 11.68% for NXG.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and NXG share 20 holdings out of 538 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or NXG?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while NXG charges 3.15%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $312 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or NXG?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% vs +37.30% for NXG, so NXG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), IVV annualized +7.00% vs +0.13% for NXG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or NXG?
NXG has been the more volatile fund at 29.3% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs NXG -86.5%.
Should I hold both IVV and NXG?
IVV and NXG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and NXG?
IVV and NXG share 20 common holdings with a 2.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 538 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or NXG?
IVV yields 1.10% while NXG yields 11.68%, so NXG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.