NXG vs SCHD
NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. NXG delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 104 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NXG | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 3.15% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $482M | $108.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 11.68% | 3.13% | |
| Holdings | 65 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +20.11% | +27.67% | |
| 1Y Return | +39.71% | +31.26% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +35.81% | +16.66% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +18.21% | +10.18% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 29.3% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -86.5% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | The Cushing Funds | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 26, 2012 | Oct 20, 2011 |
NXG vs SCHD Performance
NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund (NXG) is a ETF from The Cushing Funds and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year NXG returned +39.71% while SCHD returned +31.26%. Year to date, NXG is up 20.11% versus a gain of 27.67% for SCHD.
Over three years, NXG compounded at +35.81% per year against +16.66% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +18.21% and +10.18% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.57% annualized vs +0.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NXG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.3% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -86.5% for NXG and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NXG charges 3.15% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $315 vs $6 annually, a gap of $309 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NXG currently yields 11.68% against 3.13% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
NXG and SCHD share 1 holdings out of 152 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in NXG | Weight in SCHD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| OKE | 3.26% | 1.36% | 1.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NXG or SCHD?
NXG has an expense ratio of 3.15% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $309 per year of difference.
Which performed better, NXG or SCHD?
Over the past year NXG returned +39.71% vs +31.26% for SCHD, so NXG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), NXG annualized +0.21% vs +11.57% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, NXG or SCHD?
NXG has been the more volatile fund at 29.3% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: NXG -86.5% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both NXG and SCHD?
NXG and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between NXG and SCHD?
NXG and SCHD share 1 common holdings with a 1.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 152 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, NXG or SCHD?
NXG yields 11.68% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so NXG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.