NXG vs VYM
NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, NXG or VYM?
Mid Cap Value against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. NXG led over 3Y, VYM over 1Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NXG | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 3.15% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $366M | $95.8B |
| Dividend Yield | 13.42% | 2.23% |
| Holdings | 64 | 610 |
| YTD Return | -5.53% | +11.84%Best |
| 1Y Return | -1.47% | +16.77%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +28.02%Best | +18.83% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.34% | +10.75%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 29.3% | 13.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -86.5% | -35.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,628 | $16,662Best |
| Fund Family | The Cushing Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Sep 26, 2012 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 26, 2012 to Nov 6, 2026 (14.1 years).
NXG vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 14.1 years both funds cover.
NXG vs VYM Performance
NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund (NXG) is an ETF from The Cushing Funds and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NXG returned -1.47% while VYM returned +16.77%. Year to date, NXG is down 5.53% versus a gain of 11.84% for VYM.
Over three years, NXG compounded at +28.02% per year against +18.83% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +9.34% and +10.75% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +9.78% annualized vs -1.48%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NXG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.3% compared with 13.3% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -86.5% for NXG and -35.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NXG charges 3.15% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $315 vs $4 annually, a gap of $311 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NXG currently yields 13.42% against 2.23% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
At least 3.6% of VYM's money is in holdings NXG also owns.
Only one direction is shown: for NXG, our book for it lists positions totalling 140.1% of the fund, which is what a leveraged book looks like and is not a denominator we can divide by.
VYM and NXG share little of their money.
15 positions in common, counted across the 63 positions we hold weights for in NXG and 602 in VYM, against full books of 64 and 610.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in NXG | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| TRGPTarga Resources Corp Preferred | 4.77% | 0.25% | 4.52% |
| OKEOneok Inc. | 3.88% | 0.24% | 3.64% |
| NRGNrg Energy | 3.97% | 0.09% | 3.88% |
| IRDMIridium Communications Inc | 3.18% | 0.02% | 3.16% |
| DTMDT Midstream Inc | 2.66% | 0.05% | 2.61% |
| ETREntergy Corp. | 2.40% | 0.20% | 2.20% |
| WMBWilliams Cos. Inc. | 2.12% | 0.37% | 1.75% |
| KMIKinder Morgan Inc./de | 2.01% | 0.25% | 1.76% |
| DUKDuke Energy Corp | 1.65% | 0.38% | 1.27% |
| SOSouthern Co. | 1.59% | 0.40% | 1.19% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of NXG and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NXG or VYM?
NXG has an expense ratio of 3.15% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $311 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, NXG or VYM?
Over the past year NXG returned -1.47% vs +16.77% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), NXG annualized -1.48% vs +9.78% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, NXG or VYM?
NXG has been the more volatile fund at 29.3% annualized versus 13.3% for VYM. Worst drawdown: NXG -86.5% vs VYM -35.7%.
Should I hold both NXG and VYM?
NXG and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between NXG and VYM?
At least 3.6% of VYM's money is in holdings NXG also owns. Our book for NXG is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 15 positions in common, counted across the 63 positions we hold weights for in NXG and 602 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, NXG or VYM?
NXG yields 13.42% while VYM yields 2.23%, so NXG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than NXG?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. NXG led over 3Y, VYM over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.