IVV vs OASC
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. OASC delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | OASC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.69% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $90M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 186 | |
| YTD Return | +14.50% | +19.83% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.02% | +28.65% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.80% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.37% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 18.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -27.3% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | OneAscent Investments | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 13, 2024 |
IVV vs OASC Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF (OASC) is a ETF from OneAscent Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% while OASC returned +28.65%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.50% versus a gain of 19.83% for OASC.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
OASC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.0% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -27.3% for OASC. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while OASC charges 0.69%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $69 annually, a gap of $66 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.44% for OASC.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and OASC share 25 holdings out of 664 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or OASC?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while OASC charges 0.69%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $66 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or OASC?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% vs +28.65% for OASC, so OASC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +7.07% vs +18.33% for OASC. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or OASC?
OASC has been the more volatile fund at 18.0% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs OASC -27.3%.
Should I hold both IVV and OASC?
IVV and OASC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and OASC?
IVV and OASC share 25 common holdings with a 1.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 664 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or OASC?
IVV yields 1.09% while OASC yields 0.44%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.