IVV vs OASC
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF
Which is better, IVV or OASC?
Large Cap Blend against Small Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over the full window, OASC over 1Y. OASC is less concentrated, with 18.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | OASC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.69% |
| AUM | $886.7B | $94M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.46% |
| Holdings | 508 | 173 |
| YTD Return | +13.39% | +17.30%Best |
| 1Y Return | +20.08% | +22.78%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.29% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.88% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.9%Best | 17.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8%Best | -27.3% |
| $10,000 over 2.2 years | $14,538Best | $14,036 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9% | 18.1%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | OneAscent Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Small Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 13, 2024 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 13, 2024 to Sep 4, 2026 (2.2 years).
IVV vs OASC growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.2 years both funds cover.
IVV vs OASC Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF (OASC) is an ETF from OneAscent Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +20.08% while OASC returned +22.78%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.39% versus a gain of 17.30% for OASC.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
OASC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.5% compared with 11.9% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -27.3% for OASC. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while OASC charges 0.69%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $69 annually, a gap of $66 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.46% for OASC.
Holdings Overlap
1.3% of IVV's money is in holdings OASC also owns. 20.9% of OASC's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
OASC and IVV share little of their money.
20 positions in common, counted across the 504 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 169 in OASC, against full books of 508 and 173.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 145 positions for OASC that do not appear in our book for IVV (73.2% of the fund), and 473 for IVV that do not appear in OASC (98.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in OASC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| SNDKSandisk Corp | 0.30% | 2.35% | 2.05% |
| CINFCincinnati Financial Corp. | 0.04% | 1.76% | 1.72% |
| CFCf Industries Ho | 0.03% | 1.68% | 1.65% |
| RLRalph Lauren Corp. Class A | 0.02% | 1.52% | 1.50% |
| SYFSynchrony Financial | 0.04% | 1.47% | 1.43% |
| FLEXFlex Ltd. Ordinary Shares | 0.07% | 1.34% | 1.27% |
| HIGHartford Financial Services Group Inc. | 0.06% | 1.26% | 1.20% |
| COHRCoherent Corp. | 0.10% | 1.19% | 1.09% |
| LITELumentum Holdings Inc | 0.10% | 1.18% | 1.08% |
| INCYIncyte Corp. | 0.03% | 1.10% | 1.07% |
20.9% of OASC is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or OASC?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while OASC charges 0.69%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $66 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or OASC?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.08% vs +22.78% for OASC, so OASC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +18.54% vs +16.66% for OASC. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or OASC?
OASC has been the more volatile fund at 17.5% annualized versus 11.9% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs OASC -27.3%.
Should I hold both IVV and OASC?
IVV and OASC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and OASC?
20.9% of OASC's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 20.9% of OASC's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 20 positions in common, counted across the 504 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 169 in OASC.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or OASC?
IVV yields 1.10% while OASC yields 0.46%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is OASC better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over the full window, OASC over 1Y. OASC is less concentrated, with 18.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.