IVV vs PBOC

IVV vs PBOC

Which is better, IVV or PBOC?

Large Cap Blend against Option Writing.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVPBOC
Expense Ratio0.03%Best0.50%
AUM$876.4B$48M
Dividend Yield1.06%0.00%
Holdings5088
YTD Return+12.39%Best+7.58%
1Y Return+16.61%Best+9.82%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.38%-
5Y Return (annualized)+13.51%-
Volatility (annualized)11.8%4.6%Best
Max Drawdown-18.8%-8.3%Best
$10,000 over 2.3 years$14,739Best$12,493
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)PGIM Investments
CategoryEquityAlternative
StyleLarge Cap BlendOption Writing
InceptionMay 15, 2000May 16, 2024

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 17, 2024 to Sep 18, 2026 (2.3 years).

IVV vs PBOC growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.3 years both funds cover.

IVV vs PBOC Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - October (PBOC) is an ETF from PGIM Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% while PBOC returned +9.82%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.39% versus a gain of 7.58% for PBOC.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.8% compared with 4.6% for PBOC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -8.3% for PBOC. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while PBOC charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $50 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.00% for PBOC.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of IVV and PBOC you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

IVVPBOC

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or PBOC?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while PBOC charges 0.50%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, IVV or PBOC?

Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% vs +9.82% for PBOC, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +18.37% vs +10.16% for PBOC. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, IVV or PBOC?

IVV has been the more volatile fund at 11.8% annualized versus 4.6% for PBOC. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs PBOC -8.3%.

Should I hold both IVV and PBOC?

IVV and PBOC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or PBOC?

IVV yields 1.06% while PBOC yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is PBOC better than IVV?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.