IVV vs PEJ
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | PEJ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.57% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $251M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.50% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 32 | |
| YTD Return | +14.50% | +12.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.02% | +18.17% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.80% | +18.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.37% | +7.50% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 22.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -67.3% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 23, 2005 |
IVV vs PEJ Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF (PEJ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% while PEJ returned +18.17%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.50% versus a gain of 12.80% for PEJ.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.80% per year against +18.54% for PEJ; over five years the annualized figures are +13.37% and +7.50% respectively. Across the full 21-year window we track, PEJ has the edge at +7.66% annualized vs +7.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PEJ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.2% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -67.3% for PEJ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while PEJ charges 0.57%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $57 annually, a gap of $54 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.50% for PEJ.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and PEJ share 9 holdings out of 526 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or PEJ?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while PEJ charges 0.57%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $54 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or PEJ?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% vs +18.17% for PEJ, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (21 years), IVV annualized +7.07% vs +7.66% for PEJ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or PEJ?
PEJ has been the more volatile fund at 22.2% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs PEJ -67.3%.
Should I hold both IVV and PEJ?
IVV and PEJ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and PEJ?
IVV and PEJ share 9 common holdings with a 0.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 526 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or PEJ?
IVV yields 1.09% while PEJ yields 0.50%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.