IVV vs QBSF
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs AllianzIM US Equity Buffer15 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | QBSF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.64% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $55M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 5 | |
| YTD Return | +14.50% | +4.30% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.02% | +7.90% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.80% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.37% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 2.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -1.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | AllianzIM | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 30, 2025 |
IVV vs QBSF Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and AllianzIM US Equity Buffer15 ETF (QBSF) is a ETF from AllianzIM. Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% while QBSF returned +7.90%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.50% versus a gain of 4.30% for QBSF.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 2.3% for QBSF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -1.6% for QBSF. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while QBSF charges 0.64%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $64 annually, a gap of $61 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.00% for QBSF.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or QBSF?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while QBSF charges 0.64%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $61 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or QBSF?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% vs +7.90% for QBSF, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +7.07% vs +8.28% for QBSF. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or QBSF?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 2.3% for QBSF. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs QBSF -1.6%.
Should I hold both IVV and QBSF?
IVV and QBSF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or QBSF?
IVV yields 1.09% while QBSF yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.