IVV vs QCMU
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Direxion Daily QCOM Bull 2X ETF
Which is better, IVV or QCMU?
Large Cap Blend against Trading-Leveraged Equity.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | QCMU |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 1.07% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $21M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 4.38% |
| Holdings | 508 | 9 |
| YTD Return | +12.01%Best | -18.11% |
| 1Y Return | +16.48%Best | -11.44% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.21% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.95% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.0%Best | 133.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -8.9%Best | -68.7% |
| $10,000 over 1.2 years | $12,631Best | $9,204 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Direxion Shares ETF Trust |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Trading-Leveraged Equity |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 25, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 25, 2025 to Sep 14, 2026 (1.2 years).
IVV vs QCMU growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.2 years both funds cover.
IVV vs QCMU Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Direxion Daily QCOM Bull 2X ETF (QCMU) is an ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust. Over the past year IVV returned +16.48% while QCMU returned -11.44%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.01% versus a loss of 18.11% for QCMU.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QCMU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 133.2% compared with 12.0% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.9% for IVV and -68.7% for QCMU. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while QCMU charges 1.07%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $107 annually, a gap of $104 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 4.38% for QCMU.
Holdings Overlap
At least 0.3% of IVV's money is in holdings QCMU also owns.
Stated as a floor: for QCMU, our book for it covers 99.9% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 4 in QCMU, against full books of 508 and 9.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in QCMU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 0.27% | 22.75% | 22.48% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and QCMU you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or QCMU?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while QCMU charges 1.07%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $104 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or QCMU?
Over the past year IVV returned +16.48% vs -11.44% for QCMU, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +21.49% vs -6.68% for QCMU. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or QCMU?
QCMU has been the more volatile fund at 133.2% annualized versus 12.0% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -8.9% vs QCMU -68.7%.
Should I hold both IVV and QCMU?
IVV and QCMU have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or QCMU?
IVV yields 1.06% while QCMU yields 4.38%, so QCMU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QCMU better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.