QCMU vs VYM
Direxion Daily QCOM Bull 2X ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QCMU | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.07% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $22M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.38% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 9 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | -34.90% | +14.66% | |
| 1Y Return | -24.49% | +22.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.72% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.18% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 136.3% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -68.7% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 25, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
QCMU vs VYM Performance
Direxion Daily QCOM Bull 2X ETF (QCMU) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QCMU returned -24.49% while VYM returned +22.16%. Year to date, QCMU is down 34.90% versus a gain of 14.66% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QCMU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 136.3% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -68.7% for QCMU and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.32. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QCMU charges 1.07% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $107 vs $4 annually, a gap of $103 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QCMU currently yields 4.38% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
QCMU and VYM share 1 holdings out of 607 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QCMU | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| QCOM | 15.94% | 0.81% | 15.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QCMU or VYM?
QCMU has an expense ratio of 1.07% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $103 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QCMU or VYM?
Over the past year QCMU returned -24.49% vs +22.16% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), QCMU annualized -23.84% vs +7.01% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QCMU or VYM?
QCMU has been the more volatile fund at 136.3% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: QCMU -68.7% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both QCMU and VYM?
QCMU and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.32, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QCMU and VYM?
QCMU and VYM share 1 common holdings with a 0.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 607 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QCMU or VYM?
QCMU yields 4.38% while VYM yields 2.24%, so QCMU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.