QCMU vs SCHD
Direxion Daily QCOM Bull 2X ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 100 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QCMU | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.07% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $26M | $103.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.72% | 3.31% | |
| Holdings | 9 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | -31.29% | +26.21% | |
| 1Y Return | -21.47% | +29.99% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.73% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.67% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 136.9% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -68.7% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 25, 2025 | Oct 20, 2011 |
QCMU vs SCHD Performance
Direxion Daily QCOM Bull 2X ETF (QCMU) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year QCMU returned -21.47% while SCHD returned +29.99%. Year to date, QCMU is down 31.29% versus a gain of 26.21% for SCHD.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QCMU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 136.9% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -68.7% for QCMU and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.04. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QCMU charges 1.07% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $107 vs $6 annually, a gap of $101 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QCMU currently yields 2.72% against 3.31% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
QCMU and SCHD share 1 holdings out of 104 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QCMU | Weight in SCHD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| QCOM | 15.94% | 2.72% | 13.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QCMU or SCHD?
QCMU has an expense ratio of 1.07% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $101 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QCMU or SCHD?
Over the past year QCMU returned -21.47% vs +29.99% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), QCMU annualized -20.50% vs +11.50% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QCMU or SCHD?
QCMU has been the more volatile fund at 136.9% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: QCMU -68.7% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both QCMU and SCHD?
QCMU and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.04, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QCMU and SCHD?
QCMU and SCHD share 1 common holdings with a 2.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 104 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QCMU or SCHD?
QCMU yields 2.72% while SCHD yields 3.31%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.