IVV vs QFHD
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF
Which is better, IVV or QFHD?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. QFHD is less concentrated, with 20.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | QFHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.49% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $556,440.64 |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 1.27% |
| Holdings | 508 | 99 |
| YTD Return | +13.23%Best | +6.93% |
| 1Y Return | +17.38% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.67% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.13% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8% | 20.8%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Pacer ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jan 12, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
IVV vs QFHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs QFHD Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF High Dividend ETF (QFHD) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs. Year to date, IVV is up 13.23% versus a gain of 6.93% for QFHD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while QFHD charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $49 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 1.27% for QFHD.
Holdings Overlap
12.9% of IVV's money is in holdings QFHD also owns. 95.1% of QFHD's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of QFHD is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
91 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 98 in QFHD, against full books of 508 and 99.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 490 and 98 positions we hold weights for.
IVV holds 391 positions QFHD does not, 85.8% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 8.07%, AAPL 7.02%, MSFT 5.69%, AMZN 3.84%, GOOGL 3.00%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in QFHD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| BBYBest Buy Co. Inc. | 0.02% | 2.37% | 2.35% |
| PFEPfizer Inc | 0.24% | 2.11% | 1.87% |
| PRUPrudential Financial Inc | 0.06% | 2.27% | 2.21% |
| UPSUnited Parcel Service, Inc | 0.12% | 2.20% | 2.08% |
| TROWT Rowe Price Grp | 0.04% | 2.19% | 2.15% |
| PAYXPaychex, Inc. | 0.06% | 2.08% | 2.02% |
| GISGeneral Mills In | 0.03% | 2.01% | 1.98% |
| MOAltria Group Inc | 0.17% | 1.80% | 1.63% |
| SWKSSkyworks Solutions Inc. | 0.02% | 1.92% | 1.90% |
| ADPAutomatic Data Processing, Inc. | 0.17% | 1.74% | 1.57% |
95.1% of QFHD is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or QFHD?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while QFHD charges 0.49%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and QFHD?
95.1% of QFHD's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 95.1% of QFHD's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 91 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 98 in QFHD.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or QFHD?
IVV yields 1.06% while QFHD yields 1.27%, so QFHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QFHD better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. QFHD is less concentrated, with 20.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.