IVV vs QFRD

IVV vs QFRD

Which is better, IVV or QFRD?

Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. QFRD is less concentrated, with 37.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.1%.

Lower Fees: IVVLess Concentrated: QFRD

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVQFRD
Expense Ratio0.03%Best0.49%
AUM$882.6B$2M
Dividend Yield1.06%0.10%
Holdings508102
YTD Return+14.84%+25.62%Best
1Y Return+18.70%-
3Y Return (annualized)+22.93%-
5Y Return (annualized)+13.91%-
Top 10 Weight38.1%37.7%Best
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Pacer ETFs
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Growth
InceptionMay 15, 2000Jan 12, 2026

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

IVV vs QFRD growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

IVV vs QFRD Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF (QFRD) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs. Year to date, IVV is up 14.84% versus a gain of 25.62% for QFRD.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while QFRD charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $49 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.10% for QFRD.

Holdings Overlap

IVV already in QFRD25.8%
QFRD already in IVV99.9%

25.8% of IVV's money is in holdings QFRD also owns. 99.9% of QFRD's money is in holdings IVV also owns.

Most of QFRD is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

49 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 50 in QFRD, against full books of 508 and 102.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 1 positions for QFRD that do not appear in our book for IVV (0.1% of the fund), and 448 for IVV that do not appear in QFRD (73.4%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in QFRDDifference
NVDANvidia Corp8.00%1.37%6.63%
DDOGDatadog Inc0.11%5.60%5.49%
CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc0.32%4.71%4.39%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc1.27%3.76%2.49%
METAMeta Platforms Inc2.15%2.33%0.18%
WDAYWorkday, Inc., Class A0.06%4.39%4.33%
PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc0.41%3.97%3.56%
AVGOBroadcom Inc2.59%1.21%1.38%
LLYEli Lilly & Co.1.34%2.31%0.97%
INCYIncyte Corp.0.03%3.61%3.58%

99.9% of QFRD is already inside IVV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

IVVQFRD

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or QFRD?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while QFRD charges 0.49%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and QFRD?

99.9% of QFRD's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 99.9% of QFRD's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 49 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 50 in QFRD.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or QFRD?

IVV yields 1.06% while QFRD yields 0.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is QFRD better than IVV?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. QFRD is less concentrated, with 37.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.