IVV vs QFRD
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF
Which is better, IVV or QFRD?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | QFRD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.49% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $2M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.10% |
| Holdings | 508 | 51 |
| YTD Return | +14.14% | +23.81%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.30% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.04% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.63% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8%Best | 38.0% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Pacer ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jan 12, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
IVV vs QFRD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs QFRD Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF (QFRD) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs. Year to date, IVV is up 14.14% versus a gain of 23.81% for QFRD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while QFRD charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $49 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.10% for QFRD.
Holdings Overlap
25.9% of IVV's money is in holdings QFRD also owns. 98.9% of QFRD's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of QFRD is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
48 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 50 in QFRD, against full books of 508 and 51.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 490 and 50 positions we hold weights for.
IVV holds 434 positions QFRD does not, 72.7% of the fund.
Largest: AAPL 7.02%, MSFT 5.69%, AMZN 3.84%, GOOGL 3.00%, MU 1.63%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in QFRD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.07% | 1.40% | 6.67% |
| DDOGDatadog Inc | 0.12% | 5.65% | 5.53% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc | 0.35% | 4.52% | 4.17% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.16% | 3.51% | 2.35% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc | 0.47% | 3.97% | 3.50% |
| WDAYWorkday, Inc., Class A | 0.06% | 4.36% | 4.30% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.65% | 1.25% | 1.40% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.90% | 1.96% | 0.06% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.38% | 2.30% | 0.92% |
| INCYIncyte Corp. | 0.03% | 3.56% | 3.53% |
98.9% of QFRD is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or QFRD?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while QFRD charges 0.49%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and QFRD?
98.9% of QFRD's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 98.9% of QFRD's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 48 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 50 in QFRD.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or QFRD?
IVV yields 1.06% while QFRD yields 0.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QFRD better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.